Shared decision making

Cardiovascular disease risk communication and prevention: a meta-analysis – Mina Bakhit et al.

2024-02-13T13:13:50+11:00Cardiovascular disease, Decision aids, Primary Care, Publications, Risk, Shared decision making|

For decades, clinicians and researchers have implemented effective measures to reduce, diagnose, and treat CVD. This includes implementing public education campaigns aimed at improving awareness of the potential preventability of CVDs and accessibility to management. Cardiovascular disease risk calculators to estimate individualized risk have also played a [...]

Challenges of conducting a randomised placebo-controlled trial of spinal surgery: the SUcceSS trial of lumbar spine decompression – Emma Kwan-Yee Ho et al.

2024-02-11T13:58:00+11:00Musculoskeletal, Placebos, Publications, Research ethics, Risk, Shared decision making, Spinal, Surgery|

Although placebo-controlled trials are considered the gold standard for evaluating the efficacy of healthcare interventions, they can be perceived to be controversial and challenging to conduct for surgical treatments. The SUcceSS trial is the first placebo-controlled trial of lumbar decompression surgery for symptomatic lumbar canal [...]

Journey to kidney transplantation: patient dynamics, suspensions, transplantation and deaths in the Australian kidney transplant waitlist – Nicole L De La Mata et al.

2023-12-04T13:37:50+11:00Health literacy, Kidney, Publications, Shared decision making, Surgery|

People on the kidney waitlist are less informed about potential suspensions. Disparities may exist among those who are suspended and who return to the waitlist. We evaluated the patient journey after entering the waitlist, including suspensions and outcomes, and factors associated with these transitions.

“We’re trained to trust our patients”: a qualitative study on the general practitioners’ trust in patients for colorectal cancer shared care – Faith R Yong et al.

2023-12-04T13:08:51+11:00Cancer, General Practice, Primary Care, Publications, Shared decision making|

In a therapeutic partnership, physicians rely on patients to describe their health conditions, join in shared decision-making, and engage with supported self-management activities. In shared care, the patient, primary care, and specialist services partner together using agreed processes and outputs for the patient to be [...]

Lung cancer screening program factors that influence psychosocial outcomes: A systematic review – Kathleen McFadden et al.

2023-12-01T13:39:20+11:00Cancer, Decision aids, Mental Health, Publications, Risk, Screening, Shared decision making|

Lung cancer screening (LCS) programs are being designed and implemented globally. Early data suggests that the psychosocial impacts of LCS are influenced by program factors, but evidence synthesis is needed. This systematic review aimed to elucidate the impact of service-level factors on psychosocial outcomes to [...]

Randomized Trial of the Choosing Wisely Consumer Questions and a Shared Decision-Making Video Intervention on Decision-Making Outcomes – Muscat et al.

2023-11-01T10:00:35+11:00Health literacy, Low-value care, Publications, Shared decision making|

Reducing low-value health services is a complex issue, with significant clinical and health policy implications. This is the first randomized study to demonstrate that the consumer Choosing Wisely questions and a video intervention to promote question asking and engagement in SDM may improve participants’ intention [...]

Coping with uncertainty in clinical practice: a narrative review – Ian A Scott et al

2023-06-27T17:27:17+10:00Clinical quality, Health professionals, Publications, Risk, Shared decision making|

Uncertainty is intrinsic to clinical practice, affecting both trainees and experienced clinicians. As Sir William Osler wrote: “Medicine is the science of uncertainty and the art of probability”. Limitations in knowledge, complexities of care, and variation in patient preferences contribute to uncertainty. Personal factors such as [...]

The paradox of using SDM for de-implementation of low-value care in the clinical encounter – Paula Riganti et al

2023-06-27T17:20:45+10:00Clinical guidelines, Low-value care, Overuse, Publications, Shared decision making|

Different studies showed that when patients are better informed about the benefits and harms of interventions (eg, surgeries, screening tests, medications), they tend to decline low-value care. These findings might explain why SDM has been promoted to reduce low-value care. Focusing on the conversations between [...]

Go to Top