Cancer

Screening for cancer beyond recommended upper age limits: views and experiences of older people – Jenna Smith et al.

2023-12-01T15:18:47+11:00Ageing, Bowel cancer, Breast cancer, Cancer, Cervical Cancer, Overdiagnosis, Prostate cancer, Publications|

Internationally, screening programmes and clinical practice guidelines recommend when older adults should stop cancer screening using upper age limits, but it is unknown how older adults view these recommendations. The obective of this study is to examine older adults’ views and experiences about continuing or [...]

Use of CT, ED presentation and hospitalisations 12 months before and after a diagnosis of cancer in Western Australia: a population-based retrospective cohort study – Ninh Thi Ha et al.

2023-12-01T14:21:39+11:00Cancer, Imaging, Overdiagnosis, Overtesting, Publications, Risk, Screening, Treatment|

The present study examines the patterns of hospital and emergency department services in conjunction with both pre and post diagnostic periods of CT use, which has not been evaluated to date in adult patients with cancer. The cohort makes use of whole of population data [...]

Lung cancer screening program factors that influence psychosocial outcomes: A systematic review – Kathleen McFadden et al.

2023-12-01T13:39:20+11:00Cancer, Decision aids, Mental Health, Publications, Risk, Screening, Shared decision making|

Lung cancer screening (LCS) programs are being designed and implemented globally. Early data suggests that the psychosocial impacts of LCS are influenced by program factors, but evidence synthesis is needed. This systematic review aimed to elucidate the impact of service-level factors on psychosocial outcomes to [...]

Benefits and harms of prostate specific antigen testing according to Australian guidelines – Michael Caruana et al.

2023-12-01T13:20:42+11:00Cancer, Overdiagnosis, Overtesting, Prostate cancer, Publications, Screening, Tests|

Guidelines for prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing in Australia recommend that men at average risk of prostate cancer who have been informed of the benefits and harms, and who decide to undergo regular testing, should be offered testing every 2 years from 50 to 69 years. This [...]

Does mammographic density predict survival in women with invasive breast cancer? The need to account for potential confounding from cancer stage and overdiagnosis – Katie J Bell & Meagan Brennan

2023-12-01T12:05:02+11:00Breast cancer, Breast density, Cancer, Publications, Risk, Screening, Treatment|

High breast density on mammography is a well-established risk factor for a breast cancer diagnosis. There is interest in whether breast density might also predict how aggressive a breast cancer is, including the likelihood of causing death. If mammographic features at the time of cancer [...]

Psychosocial outcomes and health service use after notifying women participating in population breast screening when they have dense breasts: a BreastScreen Queensland randomised controlled trial – Brooke Nickel et al.

2023-12-01T10:10:23+11:00Breast cancer, Breast density, Cancer, Health policy, Publications, Women's health|

Robust evidence regarding the benefits and harms of notifying Australian women when routine breast screening identifies that they have dense breasts is needed for informing future mammography population screening practice and policy. The objective of this study is to assess the psychosocial and health services [...]

Factors Influencing Primary Care Practitioners’ Cancer Screening Recommendations for Older Adults: a Systematic Review – Jenna Smith et al.

2023-12-01T09:53:33+11:00Breast cancer, Cancer, Cervical Cancer, Primary Care, Prostate cancer, Publications, Screening|

Primary care practitioners (PCPs) play a key role in cancer screening decisions for older adults (≥ 65 years), but recommendations vary by cancer type and jurisdiction. The purpose of this study is to examine the factors influencing PCPs’ recommendations for breast, cervical, prostate, and colorectal cancer [...]

Implementation of risk stratification within bowel cancer screening: a community jury study exploring public acceptability and communication needs – Lily C. Taylor, Rebecca A. Dennison, Simon J. Griffin, et al.

2023-10-23T15:12:48+11:00Bowel cancer, Health literacy, Publications, Screening|

Risk stratification of bowel cancer screening was acceptable to the informed public. Using data within the current system (age, sex and screening results) was considered an obvious next step and collecting additional data for lifestyle and/or genetic risk assessment was also preferable to age-based screening. [...]

Go to Top